Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421443›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

Oculomotor deficits in children with sensory processing difficulties.

Timothy L Hodgson, Phoebe Cartwright, Joseph Dodd, Annabelle Hippisley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy L HodgsonSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0860-8892
Phoebe CartwrightSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Joseph DoddSchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Annabelle HippisleySchool of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atypically developing children often present with a variety of sensory processing difficulties which have been proposed to reflect abnormal development of pathways integrating sensation and action. A brain system in which the process of sensorimotor integration is particularly well understood is the oculomotor system, but no studies to date have used computerised eye tracking to assess eye movements in children with sensory processing difficulties. Method: Ten children with sensory processing difficulties completed a battery of oculomotor tasks comprising pro-saccades, anti-saccades, smooth pursuit tracking and sustained fixation. Eye movements were recorded using a high-resolution eye tracker. Results: Compared to age-matched controls, children with sensory processing difficulties were found to make more directional errors in the anti-saccade task and less-accurate smooth pursuit and sustained fixation. Conclusion: Consistent differences were found in oculomotor ability in children with sensory processing difficulties which are likely to impact children's ability to process and respond to visual information within home and school contexts. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between oculomotor deficits in children with sensory processing difficulties and the presence/absence of neurodevelopmental diagnoses. Eye tracking may be of value in the future for assessment and objective evaluation of interventions for sensory processing difficulties such as sensory integration therapy.

Indexed as

ADHDASDdevelopmental coordination disordersensory integration theorysensory processing disorder

Identifiers

PMID40421443
PMCPMC12103675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.