ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Comparative Outcomes of Apical Induction Versus Pulp Revascularization in Young Permanent Anterior Teeth with Traumatic Pulp Necrosis.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regenerative Endodontics in Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Scoping Review.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate and analyze the clinical application of pulp revascularization surgery in young permanent anterior teeth with pulp necrosis caused by trauma. Methods: This study selected 40 cases of young permanent anterior teeth with pulp necrosis caused by trauma, treated at our hospital between August 2018 and December 2022. All patients met the complete inclusion criteria and were divided into a study group and a control group based on treatment methods. The study group received pulp revascularization surgery, and the control group received apical induction surgery. There were 20 patients in each group. Comparative observation indicators included clinical treatment outcomes, clinical-related indicators, pain levels, and patient family satisfaction. Results: The treatment outcomes in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The crown-to-root ratio in the study group was lower than that in the control group, and the root canal wall thickness was higher in the study group, with all P < 0.05. The pain level grading in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Satisfaction indicators for both patients and their families were significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group, with all P < 0.05. Conclusion: Pulp revascularization surgery shows great potential in the clinical application for young permanent anterior teeth with pulp necrosis caused by trauma. It can effectively improve the treatment outcomes, clinical indicators, and alleviate pain, while significantly enhancing patient satisfaction. With continuous research and practice, this advanced treatment method is expected to provide a better oral health experience for patients and promote the development of the dental field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.