Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421414›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Engaging Parents With Child Nutrition and Feeding Information on Facebook: A Retrospective Content Analysis.

Maria Henström, Tayla Esplin, Emma Schwartzkoff, Kerith Duncanson, Gordana Popovic, Richard Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria HenströmDepartment of Medicine, Huddinge Karolinska Institutet Huddinge Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-4204
Tayla EsplinUniversity of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7480-1113
Emma SchwartzkoffSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.
Kerith DuncansonSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5525-6589
Gordana PopovicStats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Richard BallSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online social media platforms are potentially useful for disseminating public health interventions, especially to parents who seek child nutrition information online. To optimize social media interventions, health professionals need to understand how to reach and engage the target audience. The PICNIC peer-education nutrition program uses social media to teach parents about feeding practices which influence children's eating behaviors. The aim of this study was to describe social media post types, content, and communication strategies in the PICNIC program, and identify the characteristics that determined post performance. PICNIC Facebook Page intervention posts (

Indexed as

feeding behaviorfood fussinessinternet‐based interventionparentssocial media

Identifiers

PMID40421414
PMCPMC12104198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.