Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421410›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Total knee arthroplasty revision risks depending on the bone cement used-Data from 50,545 knee replacements of the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry.

Daniel Perez-Prieto, Katharina Koetter, Albert Fontanellas-Fes, Olga Martínez-Cruz, RACat working group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Perez-PrietoOrtophedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
Katharina KoetterDepartment of Health Economics & Outcome Research Heraeus Medical GmbH Wehrheim Germany.
Albert Fontanellas-FesOrtophedic Surgery, Hospital del Mar Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-9466
Olga Martínez-CruzDepartament de Salut Data Analytics Program for Research and Innovation in Health (PADRIS) Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS) Barcelona Spain.
RACat working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical data on individual bone cement brands and viscosities in cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is scarce. The Catalan arthroplasty registry (RACat) documents usage of cement brands including viscosities and the inclusion of antibiotics. The objective was to compare the clinical performance of the widely used bone cement brand PALACOS® to other blinded bone cement brands in TKA using data from the RACat. Methods: Patient data on 50,545 primary TKA between 2007 and 2017 in the RACat were analysed retrospectively. Implant survival of PALACOS bone cement was compared to other blinded bone cement brand groups using the all-cause revision risk as primary study endpoint. Results: Comparing implant survival, it was found that (1) PALACOS® (with or without gentamicin) was associated with a significantly lower revision risk compared to other cement brands (with or without antibiotics) ( Conclusions: Type of cement brand, viscosity and the addition of antibiotics have an impact on revision risk of TKA. Medium viscosity cement with gentamicin (PALACOS MV+G), for which no clinical data were previously available, was associated with the lowest revision risk in TKA. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Indexed as

antibiotic‐loaded bone cement (ALBC)bone cementCatalan Arthroplasty Register (RACat)prosthetic joint infection (PJI)total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID40421410
PMCPMC12104820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.