ArticleInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research2025
First Experience of Personalized
Article in International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individually customized grafts have become standard for reconstructing extensive chest wall defects resulting from surgical interventions for sternal malignant neoplasms. However, the outcomes of these graft implantations can be further improved by administering patient-derived cells, which have minimal oncological risks. In 2021, a 52-year-old woman with chondrosarcoma (pT2N0M0G2, stage IIB) was admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery. The patient presented with a large tumor in the body of the sternum, measuring 81 × 94 × 91 mm, according to the computed tomography (CT) scan. To address this, an individualized endoprosthesis was modeled and created using the original 'pincer-dock' construction based on CT-scan screens. The mononuclear cell fraction (MNCs) was obtained from the patient's peripheral blood one week before surgery using a Haemonetics cell separation device and cryopreserved until the day of the procedure. The resulting 30 mL MNC suspension contained 12 mln cells per 1 mL. We performed flow cytometry analysis using a FACS Aria III flow cytometer to confirm the presence of mesenchymal stromal cells in the MNCs. We also performed immunostaining for S-100, a common tumor marker for benign and malignant diseases, and D2-40, a marker for the lymphatic endothelium that reacts with Kaposi's sarcoma and a subset of angiosarcomas. None of the cells were positive for either marker. Approximately 3 ml of the MNC suspension was injected into each rib edge and 30 ml into the operating field immediately after resection. The titanium endoprosthesis was placed in the sternal defect, and the body of the endoprosthesis was securely covered with a laparoscopically mobilized omental flap. After a one-year follow-up, the patient showed no signs of recurrence or post-surgical complications. These outstanding functional and cosmetic results highlight the potential for the broader clinical utilization of minimally manipulated cells in personalized medicine in oncology. These results could pave the way for wider clinical application of peripheral blood-derived minimally manipulated cells in personalized medicine as an adjuvant for titanium endoprosthesis reconstruction of osteochondral defects in patients with sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.