Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421370›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Comparison of lower-leg muscle activation and establishment of muscle activation patterns during single-leg stance under various instability conditions in healthy active subjects: a cross-sectional study.

Mariana Sánchez-Barbadora, Vicente Alepuz-Moner, Noemi Moreno-Segura, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariana Sánchez-BarbadoraFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1416-5493
Vicente Alepuz-MonerPhysiotherapy Department, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Noemi Moreno-SeguraPhysiotherapy Department, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rodrigo Martín-San AgustínPhysiotherapy Department, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-0189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Balance training exercises are essential for treating and preventing a variety of ankle conditions such as sprains, chronic ankle instability, and muscular weakness. This muscle activation could often be increased using unstable devices. The Blackboard is a new configurable selective instability device, that has the potential to focus directly on desired muscles without overloading others through wooden half cylinders slats joined to a board by a tape in different positions. Depending on the position where they are situated, different stability training could be performed. However, its specific muscle activation patterns remain unknown. Methods: Surface electromyography was used to measure the activation level of six lower-leg muscles ( Results: Multiple differences in muscle activation were observed between conditions and among muscles. Notably, the tibialis anterior and the peroneus showed the greatest differences between conditions and the highest activation levels on the Blackboard. Additionally, forefoot supination and rearfoot eversion configurations induced selective activation of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus, respectively, highlighting their usefulness for isolating specific muscle contractions.

Indexed as

LegMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalanceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectromyographyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleYoung AdultAnkleBalanceBlackboardElectromyographyInstabilityMotor controlMuscle activationTraining

Identifiers

PMID40421370
PMCPMC12105616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.