Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421342›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Narrative Review.

Saroj K Sahu, Suprabhat Giri, Swati Das, Chinmaya Deepak Patro, Dibya L Praharaj, Bipadabhanjan Mallick, Preetam Nath, Sarat Chandra Panigrahi, Anil C Anand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saroj K SahuGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Suprabhat GiriGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Swati DasRadiodiagnosis, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Chinmaya Deepak PatroRadiodiagnosis, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Dibya L PraharajGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Bipadabhanjan MallickGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Preetam NathGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Sarat Chandra PanigrahiGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Anil C AnandGastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreaded complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and is linked to persistent organ failure, sepsis, and increased morbidity and mortality. Clinical indicators of IPN include fever, clinical deterioration, and worsening inflammatory markers. The diagnosis of IPN is based on clinical signs, microbiological confirmation, and radiological evidence, with contrast-enhanced CT being the preferred imaging modality. In the absence of tests with high sensitivity, a high clinical suspicion is required for early recognition and treatment. Although there is no way to prevent IPN, a systematic management approach with parenteral antibiotics, nutritional management, and minimally invasive procedures has become the cornerstone of the treatment. The step-up approach includes minimally invasive procedures that minimize procedure-related complications and are associated with improved outcomes. The percutaneous route remains the most common route for drainage, while endoscopic interventions are preferred for perigastric or periduodenal encapsulated collections. The use of lumen-apposing metal stents is associated with excellent outcomes in cases of infected walled-off necrosis. Patients with significant quantities of infected necrosis may benefit from direct or percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy. Minimally invasive surgical techniques followed by open surgeries are reserved for patients who do not improve with percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomies. The outcome can be maximized through a multidisciplinary approach by a team of interventional radiologists, advanced therapeutic endoscopists, and surgeons.

Indexed as

acute necrotizing pancreatitisendoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainageinfected pancreatic necrosispercutaneous catheter drainagestep-up approach

Identifiers

PMID40421342
PMCPMC12104691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.