ReviewCureus2025
Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catastrophic Gastroduodenal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Rupture During Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Severe Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Rare Life-Threatening Complication.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Has the Step-Up Approach Improved Prognosis in Severe Necrotizing Acute Pancreatitis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors Associated with the Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Fungal Infections in Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perioperative nursing management in video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for severe acute pancreatitis with infected peripancreatic necrosis: a retrospective single-center case series of 41 patients.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Association between peak D-dimer levels within 24 hours of admission and the risk of infected pancreatic necrosis in hyperlipidemic acute pancreatitis: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical, Radiological, and Endoscopic Features of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-Off Necrosis: How to Diagnose and How to Drain Them.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a dreaded complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and is linked to persistent organ failure, sepsis, and increased morbidity and mortality. Clinical indicators of IPN include fever, clinical deterioration, and worsening inflammatory markers. The diagnosis of IPN is based on clinical signs, microbiological confirmation, and radiological evidence, with contrast-enhanced CT being the preferred imaging modality. In the absence of tests with high sensitivity, a high clinical suspicion is required for early recognition and treatment. Although there is no way to prevent IPN, a systematic management approach with parenteral antibiotics, nutritional management, and minimally invasive procedures has become the cornerstone of the treatment. The step-up approach includes minimally invasive procedures that minimize procedure-related complications and are associated with improved outcomes. The percutaneous route remains the most common route for drainage, while endoscopic interventions are preferred for perigastric or periduodenal encapsulated collections. The use of lumen-apposing metal stents is associated with excellent outcomes in cases of infected walled-off necrosis. Patients with significant quantities of infected necrosis may benefit from direct or percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy. Minimally invasive surgical techniques followed by open surgeries are reserved for patients who do not improve with percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomies. The outcome can be maximized through a multidisciplinary approach by a team of interventional radiologists, advanced therapeutic endoscopists, and surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.