ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Advancing education in interventional psychiatry: scoping review of simulation training and the future of virtual reality-based learning.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extending the Impact of Mood Disorder Care Through Treatment Optimization and Accessibility.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Interventional psychiatric procedures such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have become increasingly important therapeutic options for managing severe or treatment-resistant mental illnesses. However, research suggests that gaps in training students in these techniques represent a rate-limiting step for their further dissemination and accessibility for the public. Studies have shown that the majority of psychiatry residents lack necessary competency and self-confidence in performing these treatments. Simulation based training has served as a gold standard for training procedural skills in medicine. Simulation-based training environments, particularly immersive reality technology (e.g., virtual reality [VR]), represent a promising novel avenue for trainees to develop the necessary skills for delivering these treatments. This scoping review discusses the current training in interventional psychiatry and how simulation-based training, specifically VR, can improve pedagogy in this area. Methods: In this scoping review, a literature search was conducted on the PubMed database using specific search terms such as "simulat*", "training", "ECT", "TMS", "neuromodulation", and "interventional psychiatry". The search was limited to studies with language in English from 1980 to 2023. Results: The initial search yielded 2094 articles, of which 4 evaluated the effectiveness of simulation approaches for ECT and were included in this review. No published studies were identified regarding VR-based education in ECT or rTMS. Conclusions: This scoping review provides an overview of the current landscape of pedagogical methods in interventional psychiatry and highlights the identified gaps in both the existing literature and the potential application of simulation-based environments, including VR, within this field. Considering the ongoing shift in medical education towards competency-based training, this review discusses the needs and benefits of VR-based simulators as an avenue to enhance competency in interventional psychiatry. Leveraging existing experience in the use of VR-based simulators in procedural skill acquisition in surgery and anesthesia, as well as recommendations on how to translate this approach to clinical training in psychiatry, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.