Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421312›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

Pulsed field ablation of refractory alternating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter using Impella CP in a patient with cardiogenic shock: a case report.

Isabel Rattka, Giulio Mastella, Eimo Martens, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Manuel Rattka

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel RattkaSchool of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.
Giulio MastellaSchool of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.
Eimo MartensSchool of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-0901
Karl-Ludwig LaugwitzSchool of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.
Manuel RattkaSchool of Medicine and Health, Department of Clinical Medicine-Clinical Department for Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-3871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) can lead to cardiogenic shock, particularly in patients with severely impaired left ventricular function. Acute management typically includes electrical cardioversion combined with antiarrhythmic drugs to restore sinus rhythm. In cases of therapy-resistant SVT, atrioventricular nodal ablation may be considered, although this results in permanent pacemaker dependency. Definitive treatments, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFLUT) ablation, which could potentially avoid pacemaker implantation, are seldom pursued in such critical settings, despite advancements in therapeutic efficacy. Case summary: We present the case of a 79-year-old male with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and advanced heart failure, admitted with cardiogenic shock and regular narrow-complex tachycardia. Initial attempts at electrical cardioversion combined with pharmacological rhythm control provided only temporary success, followed by recurrent episodes of alternating AF and AFLUT. This prompted the decision to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA), supported by the Impella CP device for mechanical circulatory support. The procedure, guided by the CARTO 3 electroanatomic mapping system, successfully achieved PVI and PWI with restoration of sinus rhythm. Following the procedure, the patient's haemodynamics stabilized, and sinus rhythm was maintained, along with significant improvement in left ventricular function. Discussion: This case underscores the feasibility of PFA-assisted PVI and PWI with Impella CP in the management of acute AF/AFLUT-induced cardiogenic shock. It highlights the role of mechanical circulatory support in enabling successful SVT ablation in haemodynamically unstable patients, offering an alternative to atrioventricular node ablation in critical situations.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCardiogenic shockCase reportHeart failureImpella CP

Identifiers

PMID40421312
PMCPMC12104143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.