ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
A prognostic model for highly aggressive prostate cancer using interpretable machine learning techniques.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Model Machine Learning for Survival Predictions for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning and nomogram models to predict lung metastasis and prognosticate survival in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Machine-learning prediction of 3- and 5-year mortality in lymph-node-positive medullary thyroid carcinoma: a study based on the SEER database and external validation in a Chinese cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extremely aggressive prostate cancer, including subtypes like small cell carcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma, is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. This study sought to create a robust, interpretable machine learning-based model that predicts 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival in patients with extremely aggressive prostate cancer. Additionally, we sought to pinpoint key prognostic factors and their clinical implications through an innovative method. Materials and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 1,620 patients with extremely aggressive prostate cancer in the SEER database (2000-2020). Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, and survival predictions were made using nine machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), elastic network (Enet), multilayer perceptron (MLP) and lightGBM. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as AUC, accuracy (F1 score), confusion matrix, and decision curve analysis. Additionally, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret feature importance within the model, revealing the clinical factors that influence survival predictions. Results: Among the nine models, the lightGBM model exhibited the best performance, with an AUC and F1 score of (0.8, 0.809) for 1-year survival prediction, (0.809, 0.751) for 3-year survival prediction, and (0.773, 0.611) for 5-year survival prediction. SHAP analysis revealed that M stage was the most important feature for predicting 1- and 3-year survival, while PSA level had the greatest impact on 5-year survival predictions. The model demonstrated good clinical utility and predictive accuracy through decision curve analysis and confusion matrix. Conclusion: The lightGBM model has good predictive power for survival in patients with extremely aggressive prostate cancer. By identifying key clinical factors and providing actionable predictions, the model has the potential to enhance prognostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.