Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421288›Full record

ArticleScientifica2025

Ethnobotanical Study of Medicinal Shrubs and Herbs Used by Forest-Fringe Communities of Ghana.

Michael Asigbaase, Linda Anaba, Daniel Adusu, Simon Abugre, Adisa Ayeley Musah, Collins Ayine Nsor, Daniel Akoto Sarfo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael AsigbaaseDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-1149
Linda AnabaDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-7960
Daniel AdusuDepartment of Environmental Management, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2994-2846
Simon AbugreDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5954-4374
Adisa Ayeley MusahDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1863-4111
Collins Ayine NsorDepartment of Forest Resources Technology, Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-7422
Daniel Akoto SarfoDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1218-9202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Documenting and quantitatively assessing medicinal plants and indigenous knowledge in different social contexts is critical in providing nature-based solutions to contemporary issues. Therefore, our study quantitatively evaluated medicinal shrubs and herbs in forest-fringe communities of Ghana and tested the versatility, ecological apparency and sociodemographic traits and knowledge dynamics hypotheses. Structured questionnaires, interviews and field visits were used to conduct an ethnobotanical survey involving 78 respondents, selected based on random and snowball sampling techniques. The data were analysed using quantitative indices such as indigenous knowledge index (IKI), species use value (SUV), informant agreement ratio (IAR) and ethnobotanical importance value (EIV). To test the versatility and sociodemographic traits and knowledge dynamics hypotheses, linear mixed-effects regressions were conducted, while one-way ANOVA was used to test the ecological apparency hypothesis. The Jaccard dissimilarity index was used to assess the degree of uniqueness of diseases treated by plants. We found 69 medicinal shrubs and herbs, belonging to 35 plant families, used to treat 101 diseases in the study area.

Indexed as

apparency hypothesisethnobotanical surveyindigenous knowledgemedicinal plantsspecies use valuesversatility hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID40421288
PMCPMC12105890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.