ArticleAfrican journal of bioethics2024
Genomic Data Sharing: Navigating The Ethical Issues In Collaborative Research Relationships Between The Global North-South.
Article in African journal of bioethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Context of data sharing practices in collaborative human genomic research in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Decolonizing genomic data ownership: a qualitative study of legal practices and access in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Attitudes and practices of researchers on the sharing of genomic data: a qualitative study in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Polygenic risk scores: Navigating the future of precision medicine through economic, ethical, and scientific advancements.iScience · 2026Review
- Connecting biospecimens and data: a scoping review-informed conceptual framework for digital infrastructure in biobanking and genomic research in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In recent years, Africa has seen a significant growth in genomic research, leading to the sharing of participant data between researchers in Africa and across the globe.The study aimed to investigate the ethical issues that impacted the sharing of genomic data during collaborative research and explored strategies to promote equity. Methods: This was a phenomenological qualitative study that utilized the told experiences of key informant interviews to collect data from August 2023 to March 2024. A total of 38 key informants participated in this study, of whom 28.9% were female, and their ages ranged between 30-64 years. The participants included researchers involved in genomics research (16), members of research ethics committees (14), and officials from national regulatory bodies. (8) Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo software 14 was utilized to assist in data management. A total of four main themes emerged: (mis)trust in collaborative research, inequitable access to data due, power differentials, and data sharing as a form of ethical imperialism. Results: The study revealed (mis)trust in collaborative research was influenced by fear of data misuse, and no framework for benefit sharing. (In)equitable access to data by researchers from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) was attributed to poor infrastructure and limited skill. Researchers in LMICs could be compromised because of the power differentials with their counterparts from the North, resulting in exploitation. Data sharing could be perceived as a form of ethical imperialism by the North imposing its culture on the South. Conclusion: Establishing relationships with international collaborators that are built on trust and equity is critical. Policymakers should consider developing regulatory frameworks that foster equity and fairness in data sharing and access in collaborative research. This will be facilitated by engaging in active advocacy dialogues with funders, and policymakers, and researchers from both the North and South. Researchers from the Global South should have their capacities strengthened and empowered so they have the skills necessary to access and utilize the data as well as advocate favourably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.