ReviewMedicine international
Venous access devices (Review).
Review in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strategies to Address Difficult Venous Access in Blood Sampling: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Multidisciplinary Advanced Practice Nursing-Led Vascular Access Care Pathway in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Practice-Based Descriptive Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Challenging Retrieval of a Migrated Peripheral Venous Cannula Fragment in an Obstetric Patient: Case Report.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Indian Expert Consensus on the Selection of Vascular Access Devices in Oncology Patients.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous access devices can be categorized based on the termination site of the tip of the catheter into central and peripheral access devices. Selecting the type of venous access device depends on various factors, including the condition of the patient, the anticipated duration of therapy, the use of vesicant or hyperosmolar therapies and the potential risk of complications. Peripheral intravenous catheters provide adequate venous access in the majority of hospitalized patients; however, their use is associated with high failure rates. Non-tunneled central venous access catheters are typically used in critically ill patients and are ideally suited for short-term use, while tunneled central catheters are utilized in those who require long-term intravenous therapy due to their extended dwell times. Each of these devices has unique characteristics requiring an in-depth understanding of the indications and current evidence-based recommendations to optimize their use. The present narrative review aimed to describe the different types of venous access devices and recommendations for their use based on current evidence-based recommendations. A narrative review of the literature was performed based on searches of the PubMed and Google Scholar database from 1990 through November 1, 2024. The type of device used, the insertion site, patient characteristics and clinical needs, and the risk of complications are factors that a provider needs to consider when ordering the placement of a venous access device are discussed. The present review also discusses the prevention of negative adverse events, such as bloodstream infections and thrombosis, associated with specific devices. In addition, current evidence-based recommendations for device selection and indications for use are described. The present narrative review provides a detailed examination of venous access devices that are essential in the care and treatment of patients. Since venous access is associated with inherent risks, device selection and meticulous post-insertion care are paramount in ensuring patient safety and successful therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.