Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421226›Full record

ArticleMedicine international

Artificial intelligence and patient narratives: A novel approach to assessing hope in patients with cancer.

Hakan Şat Bozcuk, Halil Göksel Güzel, Mustafa Özgür Arici, Mustafa Yildiz, Murat Koçer, Bilgeşah Kiliçtaş, Mehmet Artaç, Gökhan Karakaya, Hasan Şenol Coşkun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hakan Şat BozcukDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medical Park Antalya Hospital, Antalya 07160, Turkey.
Halil Göksel GüzelDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBU Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07100, Turkey.
Mustafa Özgür AriciDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBU Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07100, Turkey.
Mustafa YildizDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBU Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07100, Turkey.
Murat KoçerDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBU Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya 07100, Turkey.
Bilgeşah KiliçtaşDepartment of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University Hospital, Konya 04280, Turkey.
Mehmet ArtaçDepartment of Medical Oncology, Necmettin Erbakan University Hospital, Konya 04280, Turkey.
Gökhan KarakayaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vakıf (ASV) Yaşam Hospital, Antalya 07300, Turkey.
Hasan Şenol CoşkunDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vakıf (ASV) Yaşam Hospital, Antalya 07300, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of patient-generated text and its interpretation by artificial intelligence (AI) as a valid correlate of hope levels in patients with cancer. For this purpose, four medical centers recruited consecutive patients with cancer and the patients were administered a questionnaire to collect data on patient characteristics and a shortened version of the Adult Trait Hope Scale (s-ATHS). Additionally, all participants provided written text on their hope levels, which was then analyzed by a deep neural network model. AI predicted hope labels, as well as numerous patient, disease and center features which were then associated with the scores from s-ATHS using univariate and multivariate gamma regression analyses. The present study comprised 461 patients with cancer, 194 (42.1%) of whom had metastatic disease. Multivariate gamma regression analysis identified three variables independently associated with hope index scores (s-ATHS): Treatment center (B=-0.09, Wald=4.77, P=0.029), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (B=-0.09, Wald=47.41, P<0.001) and AI-predicted hope level (B=0.06, Wald=44.24, P<0.001). The results revealed that cases from one of the centers in the present study, a university hospital located in a different city than the other centers, exhibited higher hope levels. Additionally, a poorer ECOG performance status and lower AI-predicted hope levels were associated with reduced hope index scores (s-ATHS). On the whole, the present study demonstrates that AI-predicted hope levels are associated with hope index scores (s-ATHS), suggesting that monitoring AI-predicted hope levels may provide valuable insight in the practice of oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancerhopeneural networkregression analysis

Identifiers

PMID40421226
PMCPMC12105098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.