ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Challenges and hope: latest research trends in the clinical treatment and prognosis of liposarcoma.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- PPARγ suppresses the tumorigenesis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma via inactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Molecular and Immune Mechanisms Governing Cancer Metastasis, Including Dormancy, Microenvironmental Niches, and Tumor-Specific Programs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- CT and MRI imaging features of atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumor in the retroperitoneum: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Case Report: A giant dedifferentiated liposarcoma in the retroperitoneum.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical resection of a giant retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liposarcoma, as a complex disease, is characterized by intricate interactions between distinct histopathological subtypes and corresponding clinical outcomes, emphasizing the necessity of personalized approaches in diagnosis and treatment strategies. This malignant tumor originating from adipose tissue is classified into different subtypes with specific molecular markers, which not only distinguish them but also guide treatment directions. The main approach for treating liposarcoma is surgical resection, with the aim of complete excision and achieving clean margins (R0 resection) to minimize the risk of recurrence. This surgical principle emphasizes the critical need for precise preoperative planning, and in certain cases, the integration of neoadjuvant therapy may be needed to reduce the tumor to a surgically manageable size. In addition to surgery, systemic therapy plays a key role in the advanced stages of the disease, especially when resistance to traditional treatment arises. The emergence of novel systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, has opened new avenues for treating this challenging malignancy. These systemic therapies are selected on the basis of the specific molecular features of the tumor, highlighting the importance of detailed molecular diagnostics. As our understanding of the molecular basis of liposarcoma deepens, integrating clinical and molecular features is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. This comprehensive approach, which combines surgical precision with systemic therapy innovations, will change the treatment landscape for patients with liposarcoma, advancing toward more personalized and effective treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.