Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421156›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2025

Radiotherapy in breast cancer patients achieving nodal pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: a scoping review.

Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante, Amanda Cardoso, Marcelo Antonini, Felipe Pereira Zerwes, Eduardo Camargo Millen, André Mattar, Fabrício Palermo Brenelli, Antônio Luiz Frasson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco Pimentel CavalcanteDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7156-2890
Amanda CardosoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Marcelo AntoniniDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Pereira ZerwesPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eduardo Camargo MillenDepartment of Breast Surgery, Americas Oncologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
André MattarDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital da Mulher, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabrício Palermo BrenelliUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Antônio Luiz FrassonDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is widely accepted as standard treatment in breast cancer, particularly in cases of tumors with aggressive biology. NAC has increased the rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and the conversion of positive axillary nodes detected at initial diagnosis (cN+ to ypN0). In addition, NAC has allowed cases of residual disease to be selected for adjuvant treatments. This new scenario was made possible by innovative neoadjuvant treatments that increase the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) and significantly change the initial disease volume. A review of concepts is now required, including determining when postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI), traditionally indicated in function of the disease volume at the time of diagnosis, should be recommended. Methods: This scoping review discusses contemporary studies, including the recent National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-51, regarding the indication of PMRT and RNI following NAC, focusing on cases in which axillary pCR is achieved. Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies, one prospective cohort study, and the NSABP B-51, a randomized controlled trial, were included in the review. Most of the studies (n=10) evaluated PMRT alone, while 4 evaluated PMRT and RNI, and 3 analyzed only RNI. Conclusions: The current findings suggest that in cases of axillary pCR (ypN0) obtained after NAC treatment, in patients with breast cancer who had initially been diagnosed with positive axillary nodes (cT1-3 cN1 M0) no benefit is gained from PMRT or RNI. Conversely, in cases of initially more advanced clinical staging (cT4 cN2/3) or residual lymph node disease, radiotherapy should be recommended. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and the possibility of de-escalating radiotherapy according to patient response following NAC.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmmastectomyneoadjuvant therapypostmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT)regional nodal irradiation (RNI)

Identifiers

PMID40421156
PMCPMC12104955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.