Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Exploring the suitability of piecewise-linear dynamical system models for cognitive neural dynamics.

Jiemin Wu, Boateng Asamoah, Zhaodan Kong, Jochen Ditterich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiemin WuDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Boateng AsamoahCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Zhaodan KongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Jochen DitterichCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamical system models have proven useful for decoding the current brain state from neural activity. So far, neuroscience has largely relied on either linear models or non-linear models based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). Piecewise linear approximations of non-linear dynamics have proven useful in other technical applications. Moreover, such explicit models provide a clear advantage over ANN-based models when the dynamical system is not only supposed to be observed, but also controlled, in particular when a controller with guarantees is needed. Here we explore whether piecewise-linear dynamical system models (recurrent Switching Linear Dynamical System or rSLDS models) could be useful for modeling brain dynamics, in particular in the context of cognitive tasks. These models have the advantage that they can be estimated not only from continuous observations like field potentials or smoothed firing rates, but also from sparser single-unit spiking data. We first generate artificial neural data based on a non-linear computational model of perceptual decision-making and demonstrate that piecewise-linear dynamics can be successfully recovered from these observations. We then demonstrate that the piecewise-linear model outperforms a linear model in terms of predicting future states of the system and associated neural activity. Finally, we apply our approach to a publicly available dataset recorded from monkeys performing perceptual decisions. Much to our surprise, the piecewise-linear model did not provide a significant advantage over a linear model for these particular data, although linear models that were estimated from different trial epochs showed qualitatively different dynamics. In summary, we present a dynamical system modeling approach that could prove useful in situations, where the brain state needs to be controlled in a closed-loop fashion, for example, in new neuromodulation applications for treating cognitive deficits. Future work will have to show under what conditions the brain dynamics are sufficiently non-linear to warrant the use of a piecewise-linear model over a linear one.

Indexed as

cognitive neural dynamicsdynamical system modelsnon-linear dynamicsperceptual decision-makingpiecewise-linear

Identifiers

PMID40421134
PMCPMC12104248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.