ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Exploring the suitability of piecewise-linear dynamical system models for cognitive neural dynamics.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Exploring the suitability of piecewise-linear dynamical system models for cognitive neural dynamics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dynamical system models have proven useful for decoding the current brain state from neural activity. So far, neuroscience has largely relied on either linear models or non-linear models based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). Piecewise linear approximations of non-linear dynamics have proven useful in other technical applications. Moreover, such explicit models provide a clear advantage over ANN-based models when the dynamical system is not only supposed to be observed, but also controlled, in particular when a controller with guarantees is needed. Here we explore whether piecewise-linear dynamical system models (recurrent Switching Linear Dynamical System or rSLDS models) could be useful for modeling brain dynamics, in particular in the context of cognitive tasks. These models have the advantage that they can be estimated not only from continuous observations like field potentials or smoothed firing rates, but also from sparser single-unit spiking data. We first generate artificial neural data based on a non-linear computational model of perceptual decision-making and demonstrate that piecewise-linear dynamics can be successfully recovered from these observations. We then demonstrate that the piecewise-linear model outperforms a linear model in terms of predicting future states of the system and associated neural activity. Finally, we apply our approach to a publicly available dataset recorded from monkeys performing perceptual decisions. Much to our surprise, the piecewise-linear model did not provide a significant advantage over a linear model for these particular data, although linear models that were estimated from different trial epochs showed qualitatively different dynamics. In summary, we present a dynamical system modeling approach that could prove useful in situations, where the brain state needs to be controlled in a closed-loop fashion, for example, in new neuromodulation applications for treating cognitive deficits. Future work will have to show under what conditions the brain dynamics are sufficiently non-linear to warrant the use of a piecewise-linear model over a linear one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.