ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025
CanAssist Breast-based prognostication in low-intermediate estrogen receptor positive (ER
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The estrogen receptor (ER) is one of the key biomarkers in breast cancer (BC), and therapy decisions are based on ER expression levels. However, the benefit of endocrine therapy in patients with ER expression (ER Objective: The study aims to assess whether CanAssist Breast (CAB), an immunohistochemistry-based prognostic test validated globally in ER+/PR+/HER2- early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients, would help prognosticate ER Design: We conducted secondary data analyses of previously published retrospective studies to evaluate CAB prognostication in ER Methods: Analysis of CAB-based risk stratification was conducted on 2896 ER+/PR+/HER2- EBC patients with a known percentage of ER staining in both ER Results: ER Conclusion: CAB-based risk stratification of ER
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.