ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Effective Doses of Oliceridine Combined with Propofol for Painless Hysteroscopy: A Prospective Dose-Finding Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The combination of oliceridine with propofol represents a new option for complete intravenous anesthesia in painless hysteroscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) and the median effective dose (ED50) of oliceridine when combined with propofol for painless hysteroscopy. Methods: A total of 29 patients, aged between 18 and 60 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II, were initially recruited for hysteroscopy. Subsequently, 26 of these patients were included in the final analysis. Before surgery, an intravenous dose of 0.02 mg/kg oliceridine, with a dose gradient of 0.002 mg/kg, was administered using Dixon's up-and-down method. Two minutes later, 2 mg/kg of propofol was administered. The oliceridine dosage for the following patient was increased by 0.002 mg/kg if the hysteroscopy failed (defined as poor cervical dilatation, problematic hysteroscopic placement, or a Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score < 5 or any movement and frowning by the patient within 5 minutes). In contrast, the dosage was decreased by 0.002 mg/kg. At least seven crossovers had to occur before the test was stopped. The ED50 and ED95 of oliceridine in combination with propofol for hysteroscopy were determined using the probit analysis method. Results: The ED50 and ED95 of oliceridine with 95% CI were 0.0192 (0.0183-0.0216) mg/kg and 0.0237 (0.0214-0.0415) mg/kg, respectively. No patients experienced significant adverse effects. Conclusion: The study determined that the ED50 and ED95 of oliceridine in combination with propofol for painless hysteroscopy are 0.0192 mg/kg and 0.0237 mg/kg, respectively. Oliceridine at 0.0237 mg/kg provides safe and effective anesthesia when combined with propofol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.