Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Characteristics and perceived suitability of artificial intelligence-driven sports coaches: a pilot study on psychological and perceptual factors.

Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Eva Bartaguiz, Tessa Menges, Claudia Reidick, Johann-Nikolaus Seibert, Michael Fröhlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlo DindorfDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Jonas DullyDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Eva BartaguizDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Tessa MengesEndurance Coach GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia ReidickDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Johann-Nikolaus SeibertChemistry Didactics, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Access to human sports coaches is often limited by financial and logistical barriers, leading to disparities in the availability of high-quality coaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) coaches powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) might offer promising means to augment human coaches by supporting or autonomously performing specific coaching tasks within targeted domains. This study investigated AI coaches' associated attributes and perceived suitability in training contexts by addressing three primary questions: (A) Which attributes on a semantic differential scale effectively describe the dimensions of AI coaches in the context of training support? (B) Do participants with varying perceptions of AI suitability for their training practices differ in the attributes they associate with AI coaches, as measured by a semantic differential scale? (C) Do different individual achievement motives (AMS)-Sport influence the perception of AI coaches' suitability? Methods: The study comprised two parts. The first involves the development of a semantic differential scale to quantify the perceptions of AI coaches and an analysis of how different AI coach personalities, designed using an LLM, are perceived concerning their training suitability and how achievement motives influence these perceptions. Six distinct AI coach personalities were created to reflect the diverse coaching styles. Results: Factor analysis revealed four key dimensions of AI coach attributes: Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of aligning AI coaches' characteristics with their motivational profiles to improve user engagement.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence personalitiescoaching styleshuman-computer interactionlarge language modelspersonalized coachingsmart coachingtraining supportuser engagement

Identifiers

PMID40421103
PMCPMC12104278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.