ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Preferences for Biologic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Survey of Canadians with Severe Asthma.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The safety and efficacy of biologics for severe asthma have been demonstrated in clinical trials, and subsequent economic evaluations have established their value from a population perspective. Insight into patient preferences for attributes of biologic treatments can inform treatment-related decisions and promote adherence. However, such data are limited in Canada, and no willingness-to-pay (WTP) data exists. This study aimed to quantify the strength of preferences of those with severe asthma for attributes of biologic treatments. Patients and Methods: Canadians with severe asthma completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) consisting of 15 choice tasks and six biologic treatment attributes (improving daily activities, controlling other health conditions, frequency of administration, monthly out-of-pocket costs, reducing attack frequency, and reducing rescue inhaler use). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and WTP (the marginal rate of substitution of attributes for money) were estimated using a conditional logistic regression. Results: Ninety-seven eligible and unique participants completed the survey (70.1% female; mean [SD] age: 54.6 [14.4]; 48.4% ever used biologics). A dramatic (vs slight) improvement in daily activities increased the odds of a biologic being preferred by 78% (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48, 2.14), and a $100 increase in monthly out-of-pocket costs decreased the odds by 64% (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.67). On average, WTP was an extra $129 CAD in monthly out-of-pocket costs for a dramatic (vs slight) improvement in daily activities. WTP for a hypothetical biologic treatment was an extra $430 CAD in monthly out-of-pocket costs. Conclusion: Canadians with severe asthma prefer biologic treatments that dramatically improve daily activities and have lower out-of-pocket costs. This DCE is the first to include a cost attribute and estimate WTP. These data can help inform decision-making when considering access to new biologic treatments for severe asthma and clinicians when helping patients select treatments for severe asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.