Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421056›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2025

The experience of Family and Community Midwives in postnatal care: A qualitative study in Italy.

Cristina Lumia, Irene Molinari, Beatrice Mazzoleni, Antonella Nespoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristina LumiaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Irene MolinariDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University in Milan, Milan, Italy.
Beatrice MazzoleniDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University in Milan, Milan, Italy.
Antonella NespoliSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHistorically, national and international policies have focused more on care during pregnancy and childbirth rather than on the postnatal period. To solve the necessity of ensuring continuity of care after childbirth, the role of Family and Community Midwives (FaCM) was established permanently. The aim of the study is to explore the experiences and perspectives of the FaCM working in the Lombardy region of Northern Italy.

methodsThe method used in this qualitative study design is a descriptive phenomenological approach. The data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews with FaCM who voluntarily indicated their willingness to participate in the study from January to March 2024. The interviews followed a topic guide based on available literature.

resultsFifteen FaCM participated in the interviews. Two main themes emerged: 1) The contribution of a committed midwife in the community setting; and 2) The relationship between midwives, women, and other professionals. The contribution of a committed midwife in the community setting emphasized the novel role played by FaCM and their experience staying in connection with women after childbirth. Furthermore, midwives are the designated professionals responsible for ensuring continuity of care during the postnatal period. Relationships between midwives, women, and other professionals involved the challenge of collaborating within a team instead of working alone in a local service.

conclusionsThe findings reflect the experience of FaCM in an entirely new postnatal community care setting. Enhancing the contribution of midwives alongside mothers and other professionals positively impacts the health of mothers and infants throughout the whole postnatal experience.

Indexed as

continuity of carefamilymidwiferymother–baby dyadpostnatalqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40421056
PMCPMC12104840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.