Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421044›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2025

A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single-J stents.

Jonathan T Ryan, Tarek Ajami, Adam Williams, Dinno Mendiola, Bruno Nahar, Sanoj Punnen, Chad R Ritch, Dipen J Parekh, Mark L Gonzalgo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan T RyanDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4571-1944
Tarek AjamiDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-8232
Adam WilliamsDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.
Dinno MendiolaDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-8454
Bruno NaharDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3871-8742
Sanoj PunnenDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-7311
Chad R RitchDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4211-3372
Dipen J ParekhDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.
Mark L GonzalgoDesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0476-0288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study compares postoperative outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) using paediatric feeding tubes versus single-J ureteral stents. Materials and Methods: Patients underwent RC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2011 and 2018. Prospective preoperative clinical, operative and postoperative data were collected. Postoperative complications including stricture, urine leak, urinary tract infection (UTI) and ileus were compared between patients who received 5-Fr paediatric feeding tubes or 7-Fr single-J ureteral stents during surgery. Results: Two hundred thirty-four patients underwent RC with ICUD including 26 with paediatric feeding tubes and 208 with single-J ureteral stents; 41% had robotic cystectomy, with 36% of these undergoing intracorporeal ICUD. Both groups were comparable in age, gender, kidney function and comorbidities. No significant differences were observed between groups for rates of ileus (20% vs. 34%, Conclusions: Using 5-Fr feeding tubes for ureteral stenting during RC with ICUD is a safe alternative to 7-Fr single-J stents, especially for patients with small ureters or delicate anatomy. Stent type showed no significant impact on postoperative urinary complications except for a lower UTI rate with feeding tubes, suggesting comparable overall outcomes between the two stent types.

Indexed as

bladder cancerileal conduit diversionpaediatric feeding tubespostoperative complicationsradical cystectomysingle‐J stentssurgical outcomesureteral stentinguretero‐ileal stricture

Identifiers

PMID40421044
PMCPMC12104663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.