Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420998›Full record

ReviewmicroLife2025

Respiratory syncytial virus: health burden, disease prevention, and treatment-recent progress and lessons learned.

Harald Brüssow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in microLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Programmed cell death in human respiratory syncytial virus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Harald BrüssowLaboratory of Gene Technology, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-8583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a negative-sense single-stranded RNA virus of the Pneumoviridae family, represents the most important pathogen of lower respiratory tract infections in young infants causing yearly epidemics. RSV is also an important respiratory viral pathogen for older subjects, which is second only to seasonal influenza virus infections. RSV represents a substantial public health burden with respect to morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries. Prevention and treatment options would therefore lessen the global disease burden. A formalin-inactivated RSV vaccine in the 1960s induced an enhanced disease upon exposure to natural RSV. After this tragical vaccine failure, it took nearly five decades of intensive research before prevention tools were approved by health authorities. The lead was taken by passive immunity approaches with injected monoclonal antibodies directed against the fusion protein F of RSV. The elucidation of the three-dimensional structure of the F protein revealed pre- and postfusion conformations. Subsequently, structure-based antigen engineering of the F protein paved the way for development of a prophylactic vaccine. In 2023, RSV vaccines were approved for maternal vaccination to protect young infants by placental transfer of antibodies and for vaccination in older subjects. Antiviral drugs that target the RSV fusion process, the RSV replicase, or the cytoplasmic viral factories are in development. Important research papers leading to these developments are reviewed here.

Indexed as

antiviralsdisease burdenpassive immunityrespiratory syncytial virusvaccinologyvirology

Identifiers

PMID40420998
PMCPMC12104812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.