Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420996›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Organizational interventions and strategies for COVID-19 pandemic management in acute care setting: A qualitative interview study with nurse leaders in German hospitals.

Maria Zink, Johannes Wendsche, Steffi G Riedel-Heller, Franziska Jung, Marlen Melzer

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Work-organizational Strategies and Measures for Pandemic Management in Inpatient Care: Findings from Scenario Workshops].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria ZinkFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Fabricestrasse 8, Dresden, 01099, Germany.
Johannes WendscheFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Fabricestrasse 8, Dresden, 01099, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerUniversity of Leipzig, Institute for Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska JungUniversity of Leipzig, Institute for Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Leipzig, Germany.
Marlen MelzerFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Fabricestrasse 8, Dresden, 01099, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 exposed unprepared healthcare systems worldwide. In Germany, acute care hospitals faced significant challenges, particularly in organizing adequate personal protective equipment, managing high mortality rates, and accommodating extended hospitalization of patients with COVID-19. Objective: This study aimed to explore the perspectives of nurse leaders on organizational interventions and strategies implemented in hospitals to address pandemic-associated challenges and derive knowledge for future crises. Design: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted between July 2022 and June 2023, utilizing semi-structured interviews with nurse leaders across different management levels (strategic, middle, and operative management) in hospitals in Saxony, Germany. Setting: This study was conducted in hospitals across Saxony, Germany. Participants: The study included 30 nurse leaders from nine different hospitals, representing a diverse sample in terms of hospital characteristics (ownership, hospital size, regional distribution, and level of care) and participant demographics. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis in MAXQDA. Results: Eight strategies were identified (four core and four secondary) with various corresponding interventions that hospitals used to manage the pandemic, including infection control, adaptation of hospital capacities, human resource management, direct patient care delivery, management of the provision of non-COVID-19 care, transparent organization of the flow of information and decision-making, cooperation and teamwork, and evaluation and flexible adaptation. This study highlights the importance of flexibility, creativity, internal and external support, leadership, crisis communication, participatory decision-making, evaluation, and error management in crisis management. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive documentation of hospital pandemic management from the perspective of nurse leaders, offering a basis for future research and practice. Effective hospital pandemic management requires a flexible, context-specific approach supported by strong leadership, internal and external support, and participatory processes. These findings emphasize the need for ongoing evaluation during crises and for a culture that encourages reflection and learning from crises to improve future responses.

Indexed as

Crew resource managementDisaster planningDisease outbreaksHealthcareHealth services administrationHospitalHospitalsLessons learnedNursing staffOrganizational innovationOrganizational learningPandemic response strategiesSARS-CoV-2Stakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID40420996
PMCPMC12104714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.