Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420967›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Abolish Psychiatry, Abolish Neurology: Toward a Unified Discipline of Brain Medicine.

Shaheen E Lakhan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. One brain, one mind: A joint EPA-EAN leadership perspective on brain health.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shaheen E LakhanMedical Office, Click Therapeutics, Inc., New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The longstanding division between psychiatry and neurology is a historical artifact, not a scientific necessity. Despite addressing the same organ, these fields operate as separate disciplines, fragmenting education, care, research, regulation, and reimbursement. This editorial argues for the abolition of that divide and the creation of a unified discipline of brain medicine. Drawing on advances in systems neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and neuromodulation, I present a comprehensive critique of the dual-specialty model and propose an integrated alternative. The editorial synthesizes data from brain network research, the lived inefficiencies of medical training and healthcare delivery, and the constraints placed on innovation by legacy frameworks. I highlight how computational psychiatry, neurobiology, and regulatory reform can converge to enable a model that is mechanistically grounded and clinically effective. Through two conceptual tables, I demonstrate the shared circuitry across traditionally labeled psychiatric and neurological conditions, and the system-wide efficiencies gained through integration. The future of brain care lies not in silos, but in circuits, and it is time our institutions, educators, payers, and innovators catch up with science. This is a call to unify how we understand, teach, regulate, and treat the brain not only for administrative elegance but also for clinical reality, therapeutic progress, and human dignity.

Indexed as

brain medicinecomputational psychiatrydigital therapeuticsfda regulationmedical educationnetwork neuroscienceneurologypsychiatryreimbursementtransdiagnostic care

Identifiers

PMID40420967
PMCPMC12105051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.