ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Effects of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Review
- Persistent effects of neonatal diarrhea on Holstein dairy cow lactation performance through multiple parities.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Progress in the application of traditional Chinese medicine and natural products for the prevention and treatment of calf diarrhea: a review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Xinjiang is characterized by extremely cold weather and significant seasonal temperature variations, and these harsh climatic conditions have led to a high incidence of diarrhea and increased mortality rates among newborn calves, resulting in substantial economic losses for the local cattle industry. Methods: In this study, a one-way experimental design was employed. A total of 45 newborn calves (Simmental♂ × Yili brown cattle♀, male, average body weight (BW) 35.58 ± 5.79 kg) were randomly allocated into five experimental groups. Each group consisted of three pens, with three calves per pen, and this allocation was carried out based on the percentage of SBWP used as a feed supplement. The diet for the five groups were as follows: group I received milk + basal diet without additives, group II received milk + basal diet + 0.005% gentamicin, group III received milk + basal diet + 250 mg/day/calf SBWP, group IV received milk + basal diet + 500 mg/day/calf SBWP, and group V received milk + basal diet + 1,000 mg/day/calf SBWP. Daily feed consumption was recorded, and BW was measured on days 1, 14, and 28 to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake, and feed-to-gain (F/G) ratio. Fecal samples were collected on days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 for microbiological analysis, and fecal scores were subjectively monitored and recorded daily by the same individual. In addition, blood samples were collected from each calf at the end of the trial for immune analysis. Results: In comparison to group I, group IV showed a significant increase in both BW and ADG. Specifically, on the 14th and 28th trial days, BW of group IV showed a significant increase of 3.95 and 4.90%, respectively ( Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the supplementation of 500 mg/day/calf SBWP to newborn calves significantly improves their growth performance, serum immunity, and intestinal microbiota structure while significantly reducing diarrhea frequency and inflammation. These findings indicate that the supplementation of 500 mg/day/calf SBWP can most effectively enhance the growth performance and reduce the diarrhea frequency in newborn calves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.