Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420850›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Migrating hoverflies as potential food source for co-migrating insectivorous birds.

Antonín Hlaváček, Peter Mikula, Jiří Hadrava, Radek K Lučan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonín HlaváčekDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2 12800, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-7396
Peter MikulaDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, Prague 16500, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-9105
Jiří HadravaDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2 12800, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-6399
Radek K LučanDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2 12800, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9575-3173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most migrating birds must replenish energy reserves during migration. Food availability significantly influences migratory routes and can even force migrants to detour, but still little is known about potential co-migration between insectivorous birds and their insect prey. To address this gap, we focused on day-flying insects and the insectivorous birds migrating through the Červenohorské sedlo mountain pass, Czech Republic. During four seasons of insect and bird trapping, using Malaise trap and mist-nets, respectively, we recorded 23 094 birds of 80 species and 35 087 migrating hoverflies (Syrphidae) of 47 species. We found a strong temporal correlation between the number of migrating hoverflies and insectivorous birds crossing the mountain pass. The observed pattern suggests that a similar phenomenon may occur in lowlands, where both groups stop over before and after crossing the mountains. These stopovers may provide migratory birds with abundant and reliable food resources. We also found that hoverflies comprised 88% of the biomass of all trapped insects, making them the most abundant potential prey of migrating birds. Our results outline the co-migration of birds and hoverflies and shed light on possible predator-prey dynamics during migration.

Indexed as

co-migrationDipteramountain barrierpredatorpreySyrphidae

Identifiers

PMID40420850
PMCPMC12105790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.