ArticleAugmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)2026
Visual-perceptual features of augmentative and alternative communication displays affect efficiency of motor reaching by individuals with Down syndrome: a pilot study.
Article in Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with Down syndrome often have speech and language impairments that interfere with their ability to use speech to meet their full range of communication needs. Visual communication supports in the form of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are often a solution for individuals who require support to their own natural speech, including those with Down syndrome. Messages are produced via touch or reach to communication symbols presented on these AAC displays. While a line of past research has detailed the influence of AAC display design on the efficiency with which individuals with and without disabilities can find target symbols within an array, few studies have examined how different AAC displays might influence touch/reaching. Yet critical clinical implications arise if display design is resulting in inefficient (and fatiguing) motor/reaching behavior. This pilot study evaluated how visual-perceptual characteristics of AAC displays affected the efficiency and quality of reaches by six individuals with Down syndrome and six individuals without disabilities matched on age, gender, and hand preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.