ArticleTrends in hearing
Auditory Learning and Generalization in Older Adults: Evidence from Voice Discrimination Training.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory learning is essential for adapting to continuously changing acoustic environments. This adaptive capability, however, may be impacted by age-related declines in sensory and cognitive functions, potentially limiting learning efficiency and generalization in older adults. This study investigated auditory learning and generalization in 24 older (65-82 years) and 24 younger (18-34 years) adults through voice discrimination (VD) training. Participants were divided into training (12 older, 12 younger adults) and control groups (12 older, 12 younger adults). Trained participants completed five sessions: Two testing sessions assessing VD performance using a 2-down 1-up adaptive procedure with F0-only, formant-only, and combined F0 + formant cues, and three training sessions focusing exclusively on VD with F0 cues. Control groups participated only in the two testing sessions, with no intermediate training. Results revealed significant training-induced improvements in VD with F0 cues for both younger and older adults, with comparable learning efficiency and gains across groups. However, generalization to the formant-only cue was observed only in younger adults, suggesting limited learning transfer in older adults. Additionally, VD training did not improve performance in the combined F0 + formant condition beyond control group improvements, underscoring the specificity of perceptual learning. These findings provide novel insights into auditory learning in older adults, showing that while they retain the ability for significant auditory skill acquisition, age-related declines in perceptual flexibility may limit broader generalization. This study highlights the importance of designing targeted auditory interventions for older adults, considering their specific limitations in generalizing learning gains across different acoustic cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.