ArticleSmall methods2026
Interpretable Differential Abundance Signature (iDAS).
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell differential abundance detection: A new angle on dissecting tumor heterogeneity.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Interpretable Differential Abundance Signature (iDAS).Small methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell technologies have revolutionized the understanding of cellular dynamics by allowing researchers to investigate individual cell responses under various conditions, such as comparing diseased versus healthy states. Many differential abundance methods have been developed in this field, however, the understanding of the gene signatures obtained from those methods is often incomplete, requiring the integration of cell type information and other biological factors to yield interpretable and meaningful results. To better interpret the gene signatures generated in the differential abundance analysis, iDAS is developed to classify the gene signatures into multiple categories. When applied to melanoma single-cell data with multiple cell states and treatment phenotypes, iDAS identified cell state- and treatment phenotype-specific gene signatures, as well as interaction effect-related gene signatures with meaningful biological interpretations. The iDAS model is further applied to a longitudinal study and spatially resolved omics data to demonstrate its versatility in different analytical contexts. These results demonstrate that the iDAS framework can effectively identify robust, cell-state specific gene signatures and is versatile enough to accommodate various study designs, including multi-factor longitudinal and spatially resolved data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.