Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420612›Full record

ReviewAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2025

Anesthesia for robot-assisted surgery: a review.

Małgorzata Barud, Bartłomiej Turek, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Dorota Siwicka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NIRS monitoring during steep trendelenburg in robotic prostatectomy.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026
    Observational
  5. Monitoring Oxygen Metabolism Using the Oxygen Reserve Index in Patients Undergoing Robotic Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Małgorzata BarudFirst Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Bartłomiej TurekAnesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Clinic, University Clinical Hospital No. 4, Lublin, Poland.
Wojciech DąbrowskiFirst Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Dorota SiwickaFirst Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic surgery has become increasingly popular over the last 30 years. This technique is particularly attractive due to its minimally invasive nature, high precision compared to open and laparoscopic techniques, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay for patients, and faster recovery. For an anesthesiologist, robot-assisted operations involve numerous challenges resulting from the surgical technique. The most important problems during anesthesia include changes in physiology resulting from the development of pneumoperitoneum and a steep Trendelenburg position. This review discusses problems that may be encountered by an anesthesiologist performing anesthesia during robotic surgery.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaRobotic Surgical ProceduresHead-Down TiltHumansanesthesiapneumoperitoneumrobot-assisted surgerysteep Trendelenburg position

Identifiers

PMID40420612
PMCPMC12210366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.