Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420603›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care

HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Service Delivery Models for Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.

Ethan Cowan, Susie Hoffman, Laurie J Bauman, Yvette Calderon, Tatiana Gonzalez-Argoti, Christine T Rael, Jonathan Porter, Joanne E Mantell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ethan CowanRutgers, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-0549
Susie HoffmanHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Laurie J BaumanEinstein-Rockefeller-CUNY Center for AIDS Research, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry and Behavioral Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Yvette CalderonIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Tatiana Gonzalez-ArgotiEinstein-Rockefeller-CUNY Center for AIDS Research, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry and Behavioral Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Christine T RaelUniversity of Colorodo, School of Nursing, Denver, CO, USA.
Jonathan PorterDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Joanne E MantellHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Statistics, Data Science, and Data Management (SDM) CoreP30MH043520 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MILTON L WAINBERG · 2003 to 2026
$48.2M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH043520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundOral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectively prevents HIV but is underutilized in the United States, particularly among populations with higher incidence of HIV. Emergency departments (EDs), which often care for medically underserved individuals, could play a key role in expanding PrEP access. However, integrating PrEP into ED workflows presents challenges.MethodsThis qualitative study involved interviews with 22 stakeholders from 15 EDs and 4 sexual health clinics across the United States. Participants included ED leaders, providers, and navigators. The data were analyzed using a PrEP care cascade model, focusing on provider buy-in, patient identification, education, PrEP initiation, and linkage to care.ResultsKey barriers included limited provider knowledge, ED priorities focused on acute care, and the reliance on grant funding without long-term plans for sustainability. Successful programs relied on ED champions to advocate for PrEP and improve staff engagement. Some EDs offered same-day PrEP prescriptions or starter packs, which improved uptake, but most relied on referrals and had low follow-up rates. Patient identification strategies, such as using navigators or risk scores, varied across sites. Education was often led by ancillary staff, as ED providers had limited time and training. Sustainability remained a major challenge, as most programs were dependent on short-term funding.ConclusionsTo expand PrEP access in EDs, it is essential to address systemic barriers, improve provider training and establish sustainable funding models. Streamlined workflows, dedicated staff, and targeted interventions can help EDs play a more active role in HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsDelivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agentsaccess barriershealthcare access and disparitiesimplementation scienceprEP (preexposure prophylaxis)prevention programs

Identifiers

PMID40420603
PMCPMC12117224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.