ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2025
Assessing Caudal Epidural Anatomy in Children: A Comparison of Palpation and Ultrasound for Sacral Cornua Identification.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the identification of the sacral cornua using palpation and ultrasound, and to evaluate the sacrococcygeal area via ultrasound across different age groups of children. Methods: This study included 348 children aged 1 to 84 months, who were divided into three age groups: 1-24 months, 25-48 months, and 49-84 months. Sacral cornua were assessed using both palpation and ultrasound imaging. Palpation findings were categorized as "good", "difficult", or "non-palpable". Ultrasound imaging of the sacral cornua was classified as "clear", "unclear", or "invisible". Measurements taken included the inter-cornual distance, the anteroposterior diameter of the sacral canal, the distance from the skin to the sacral canal, and the distance from the dural sac to the cornua level. Results: Palpation of the sacral cornua was rated as "good" in 75.9% of patients, "difficult" in 22.4%, and "non-palpable" in 1.7%. All patients with "good" cornua palpation were also classified as "clear" on ultrasound imaging. Among the cases with "difficult" palpation, 76% showed a "clear" ultrasound image, while 24% were "unclear". Only one patient had "invisible" cornua on ultrasound. The mean distance from the dural sac to the cornua level was 3.72±1.64 cm, and this distance increased significantly with age ( Conclusion: Ultrasound is a valuable tool for identifying the sacral cornua, especially when palpation is difficult, and offers reliable, detailed information on sacral anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.