Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420497›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Insurance Expansion During Pregnancy.

Philip Hochuli, Christian P R Schmid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip HochuliCSS, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9207-1249
Christian P R SchmidCSS Institute, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-385X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyze how the abolition of cost-sharing in health insurance affects pregnant women's gross spending on health care services using an exogenous policy change in Switzerland. Using non-linear regression, we find that the policy slightly increases average gross spending, contrasting policymaker expectations of no impact on demand. More importantly, however, we find strong demand responses for specific types of services (physiotherapy, laboratory services), in particular for below-median income individuals. Within this group, we find that physiotherapy increases as much as 50% in response to the policy change. Additionally, we find suggestive evidence of a relative improvement of newborn health among individuals with below-median income, indicating that additional use of healthcare services may be beneficial. However, we find no evidence of an impact on maternal health. These results highlight that cost-sharing policies-such as the one we examine-need to balance trade-offs between reducing healthcare costs and addressing the health and equity implications of such policies.

Indexed as

Cost SharingInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthAdultFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth PolicyHumansPregnancySwitzerlandcost‐sharing exemptiondemand for healthhealth insurancepregnancy care and maternal health

Identifiers

PMID40420497
PMCPMC12316584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.