Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420489›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2025

Interventions to Support Psychological Health Outcomes for Children and Families Experiencing Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) Admission: A Scoping Review.

Grace Scott, Leigh M Dunn, Belinda Dow, Justin Kenardy, Alexandra C De Young, Debbie A Long

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grace ScottSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Leigh M DunnSchool of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Belinda DowSchool of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Justin KenardySchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-8450
Alexandra C De YoungQueensland Centre for Perinatal and Infant Mental Health, Children's Health Queensland, Hospital Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Debbie A LongSchool of Nursing, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1164-2399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmission to a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) can be a traumatic experience for children and their families. Most children admitted to a PICU will survive; however, a significant proportion of children and their parents will experience serious psychosocial difficulties before, during and after PICU admission. There remains a knowledge gap concerning effective interventions for preventing or reducing adverse psychological outcomes for children and their caregivers.

aimThis study aimed to identify and describe the types and characteristics of psychosocial interventions for the prevention, early detection and/or treatment of adverse psychological outcomes in children and/or their families before, during and after experiencing PICU admission and to identify gaps in the current literature. STUDY

designA scoping review was conducted through PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus. English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature were searched from the earliest available records to July 2024. Key search domains included interventions and efficacy, feasibility, measurement instruments and psychological outcome variables.

resultsOf 3137 studies initially identified through database searching, 10 were included for full review. The findings from included articles describe nine universal interventions that include information provision and psychoeducational approaches, and one targeted psychotherapeutic intervention. There exists a significant paucity of targeted and clinical interventions for those patients and families at high risk of poor psychological outcomes. The Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE) programme emerged as a notable intervention, demonstrating reductions in parental stress, improved emotional coping and increased parental engagement in their child's care.

conclusionsThe existing literature examining the efficacy and effectiveness of psychosocial interventions to prevent or treat poor psychological outcomes before, during and after PICU admission is limited. Although a diverse range of interventions has been explored, notable discrepancies have emerged between these interventions and the actual needs and preferences of children and their families. Challenges related to standardisation and intervention type, setting, timing, scope and target must be carefully addressed in future research. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review highlights the need for targeted and clinical evidence-based psychosocial interventions in PICUs to address psychosocial outcomes including posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children and families. Critical care nurses are uniquely positioned to identify early signs of psychological distress and should advocate for and actively participate in the development and delivery of tailored interventions with families to improve outcomes and recovery.

Indexed as

FamilyIntensive Care Units, PediatricParentsStress, PsychologicalAdaptation, PsychologicalChildHumansintensive careinterventionpaediatricPICUpsychological

Identifiers

PMID40420489
PMCPMC12107019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.