ReviewJournal of separation science2025
Recent Trends in the Development of Green Analytical Sample Preparation Methods Using Advanced Materials.
Review in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Biosensing: From Synthetic Recognition to Integrated Biointerfaces.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Aerogel Pore-Confined High-Loading MOF-199 for Micro-Solid-Phase Extraction of Methorphan Enantiomer in Biological Samples.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Microchemical Techniques for Multiclass Fungicide Residue Analysis in Complex Food Matrices.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Continuous sample drop flow microextraction: a versatile and green microextraction tool in analytical chemistry.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent concern about the impact of environmental preservation and the health of living beings has opened new avenues for scientific research. In this context, contemporary analytical chemistry has been marked by the development of green analytical methodologies, which aim to reduce the use of toxic reagents and minimize the environmental impact of analytical processes. Progress in this area involves the optimization of sample preparation techniques and the use of new functional materials, which contribute to a more sustainable and efficient analysis. Among these methodologies, miniaturized sample preparation techniques stand out, as they use smaller volumes of solvents and offer high sensitivity and selectivity. The use of advanced materials, such as molecularly imprinted polymers, MOFs, and conductive polymers, has driven innovation in analytical procedures regarding complex matrices, including environmental, food, and biological samples. These materials offer high selectivity and stability, improving efficiency in the extraction and detection of specific analytes. This review explores the integration of sustainable and green methodologies. It critically highlights applications and evaluates them using the Analytical Greenness Metric for Sample Preparation, based on publications from the past 6 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.