Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420435›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2025

Assessment of Esophagogastric Junction Barrier Function With the Supine-Upright Transition of the Chicago Classification Protocol.

Stefano Siboni, Roberta De Maron, Andrea Pasta, Marco Sozzi, Francesco Calabrese, Pierfrancesco Visaggi, Nicola De Bortoli, Anthony Hobson, Jordan Haworth, Daniele Bernardi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Stefano SiboniDivision of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-3135
Roberta De MaronDivision of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea PastaGastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-4506
Marco SozziDivision of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco CalabreseGastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Pierfrancesco VisaggiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Traslational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-5301
Nicola De BortoliDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Traslational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-1060
Anthony HobsonThe Functional Gut Clinic, London, UK.
Jordan HaworthThe Functional Gut Clinic, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5325-0789
Daniele BernardiDivision of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Takahiro MasudaDepartment of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Giovanni AldinioDepartment of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marina ColettaGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Roberto PenaginiGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6918-9479
Edoardo SavarinoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-2894
Emanuele AstiDivision of General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3388-0660
Elisa MarabottoGastroenterology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe straight leg raise (SLR) is a provocative maneuver used to assess the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) barrier function during high-resolution manometry (HRM) and is part of the Milan Score (MS). The Chicago Classification 4.0 (CCv4.0) protocol requires patients to perform a supine-upright transition (SUT), increasing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). The aim of this study was to compare the SUT and SLR maneuvers for efficacy in increasing IAP and in predicting pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

methodsConsecutive adult patients with persistent GERD symptoms undergoing HRM and pH-impedance were prospectively enrolled. After completion of the supine swallows of the CCv4.0 protocol, the SLR maneuver was performed and the patients were asked to get up to the upright position (SUT). IAP and intra-esophageal pressure (IEP) were recorded at baseline and during the maneuvers. GERD was defined as acid exposure time > 6% according to Lyon 2.0.

resultsAmong the 110 patients included (age 55 years; 59.1% female, BMI 25.4 kg/m

conclusionsSUT is comparable to SLR, with higher sensitivity but lower specificity. When both are concordant, the SUT can strengthen confidence in SLR and increase the accuracy of the Milan Score.

Indexed as

Esophagogastric JunctionGastroesophageal RefluxAdultAgedEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSupine Positiongastro‐esophageal reflux diseasehigh‐resolution manometryintra‐abdominal pressurestraight‐leg raise maneuver

Identifiers

PMID40420435
PMCPMC12623285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.