ArticleInternational journal of toxicology
Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Following Twice-Daily Oral Administration for 28 Days in Beagle Dogs.
Article in International journal of toxicology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (2-DG) has anticonvulsant and antiseizure effects in rodent models and is in the development phase for novel antiseizure treatment. To evaluate potential toxicity, Beagle dogs (five/sex/group) were orally gavaged with either vehicle (deionized water) or 2-DG (5, 30, and 90 mg/kg BID) for 28 days followed by a 14-day recovery period. The safety endpoints evaluated were mortality, clinical observations, body temperature, respiratory assessment, body weights, food consumption, ophthalmic examinations, electrocardiograph (ECG), blood pressure, cardiac biomarker (NT-proBNP), and pathology. Toxicokinetic analysis was conducted after the first dose on days 1 and 28. The dose formulation analysis confirmed that 2-DG concentrations were within 93%-107% of the target concentrations. There were no 2-DG associated effects observed in mortality, clinical signs, body temperature, respiratory parameters, body weights, food consumption, ophthalmic examination, ECG, blood pressure, and NT-proBNP. There was an increase (∼1.7X) in aspartate transaminase on day 29, while histopathological evaluation revealed hepatic cytoplasmic alterations in 2 of 6 dogs on day 29 and only in 1 of 4 dogs on day 43 at 90 mg/kg BID. These changes were considered non-adverse because of minimal severity, reversibility trend after recovery period and no correlative increase in alanine transaminase. Toxicokinetic evaluation revealed dose dependent increases in C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.