Trial reportBMC cancer2025
Peer2Me - impact of peer support on self-efficacy in young adult cancer survivors (YA-CS): findings from a comprehensive cohort design.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05336318 (Evaluation of a Peer Supported Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Peer Supported Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of transition readiness among adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
- Article
- Scoping review of psychosocial support interventions in oncology nursing: Applications across diverse and underserved cancer populations.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies suggest that young adult cancer survivors (YA-CS) experience unmet needs regarding informational exchange about their disease and emotional support from peers. Currently, there is a lack of evaluated peer support interventions in Germany. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of "Peer2Me", a three-month one-to-one peer mentoring program, designed to improve self-efficacy among YA-CS.
methodsThis study conducted a bi-center comprehensive cohort design and enrolled YA-CS (18-39 years old) undergoing acute treatment in Leipzig and Hamburg (Germany) across all tumour entities diagnosed within the last six months. YA-CS were allocated by preference to the intervention (IG, receiving peer mentoring) and comparison group (CG, care as usual). Following mentor training, tandems were matched by diagnosis, age, and gender. YA-CS completed questionnaires at baseline (t1), post-intervention (3 months later, t2) and three months post-intervention (t3). The primary outcome was self-efficacy measured with the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) and the Cancer Behaviour Inventory (CBI-B). Statistical analyses included mixed-design ANOVA and ANCOVA, controlling for baseline scores.
resultsOut of 274 eligible YA-CS, a total of 106 YA-CS (IG: n = 77, CG: n = 29) completed the study. Two-thirds of YA-CS (66.7%) expressed a clear preference to be allocated to the IG. Baseline differences in coping behaviors were noted, with the IG demonstrating lower scores, suggesting a higher need for support. The ANCOVA revealed no group effects for the change of mean GSES scores from t1 to t2 (p =.897) or from t1 to t3 (p =.779). Also, no significant differences in the improvement of mean CBI-B scores between groups could be found from t1 to t2 (p =.903) or from t1 to t3 (p =.995).
conclusionsThe "Peer2Me" program did not demonstrate a significant effect on improving self-efficacy among YA-CS during acute treatment. Although interest in peer mentoring was high, the intervention showed no measurable benefit in comparison with standard care. While the need for support was evident, further research is required to optimize peer interventions for this group.
trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered on February 4, 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05336318).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.