Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420287›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

From mother to piglet: the lasting influence of the maternal microbiome.

Alessandra Tancredi, Thomas Matthijs, Eric Cox, Filip Van Immerseel, Evy Goossens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alessandra TancrediLivestock Gut Health Team (LiGHT) Ghent, Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Thomas MatthijsLaboratory of Immunology, Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Eric CoxLaboratory of Immunology, Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Filip Van ImmerseelLivestock Gut Health Team (LiGHT) Ghent, Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Evy GoossensLivestock Gut Health Team (LiGHT) Ghent, Department of Pathobiology, Pharmacology and Zoological Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. evy.goossens@ugent.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven their crucial roles in agriculture and biomedical research, promoting pig health is essential. A balanced gut microbiota is vital for immune development, metabolism and pathogen resistance, and requires optimal initial colonization by beneficial bacteria. This becomes particularly evident during early life stages, like suckling and weaning, where disruptions can lead to long-term health issues. Understanding the factors influencing microbiome development during these phases is fundamental for enhancing pig health. On these basis, rectal swab samples from eighteen sow-piglet pairs were collected at multiple time points from 7 days after birth to 10 days post-weaning, and analyzed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This study aims to understand the maternal influence on piglet microbiota development during the suckling-weaning period, exploring microbial diversity, composition and additional influencing factors such as age, piglet and weaning.

resultsα diversity significantly increased with piglet age (p < 0.001) and stabilized upon weaning, with maternal influence and differences between individual piglet affecting variability before weaning. Post-weaning α diversity was influenced by the pen environment (contributing to 14.5-16% of the variability between piglets) rather than age. Both the sow (~ 9.6%) and age of the piglets (20-30%) had a significant impact on the microbial β diversity over the entire timeframe. Moreover, at 10 days post-weaning a significant influence of the cage mates on piglets microbial β diversity was observed (~ 24.6%). Source-tracking analysis revealed a significant maternal contribution to piglet microbiome at 7 days (31.68%), which decreased over time but remained at 13.33% post-weaning. Piglet microbiome exhibited consistency across time, with 22.55-61.23% of bacteria retained from previous stages. Cage mates contributed 53.54% to the microbiome at 10 days post-weaning. Additionally, 68.32% of piglets microbiome at 7 days was derived from sources not included in the study, decreasing to 37.6% by 10 days post-weaning. ASV-level analysis showed that the majority of maternally transmitted ASVs pre-weaning persisted until the last time point, with both beneficial bacteria and pathobionts being transmitted.

conclusionsThis study highlights the significant influence of maternal microbiota on piglet gut microbiome development, affecting both diversity and composition. Beneficial bacteria are transmitted from mothers to offspring and persist through early developmental stages, thereby emphasizing the long-lasting impact of maternal microbiome and the importance of early microbial colonization for piglet health.

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene sequencingColonizationFecal microbiotaMaternal microbiotaMicrobial diversityPigletWeaning

Identifiers

PMID40420287
PMCPMC12108014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.