ArticleBMC rheumatology2025
Personalized dose reduction strategies for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for treating axial spondyloarthritis: a clinical and economic evaluation with predictive modeling.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-habitat radiomics on T2-FS MRI for identifying spatial patterns of axial spondyloarthritis-associated bone marrow edema.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal trends and socioeconomic drivers of hip-knee osteoarthritis burden in East Asia: a GBD-based modeling study (1990-2023).Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAxial spondyloarthritis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease that significantly affects quality of life and imposes a high economic burden on patients due to the cost of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Dose reduction strategies for bDMARDs may offer a feasible approach to maintaining clinical efficacy while reducing costs. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-efficiency of bDMARD dose reduction in patients with AS and apply machine learning to identify key factors influencing disease control.
methodsThis 12-month prospective study, 368 AS patients receiving ≥ 3 months of full-dose bDMARDs were included. Among 215 initial responders (ASDAS < 2.1), 146 underwent dose reduction while 69 continued full-dose therapy. Clinical outcomes such as C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) and ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) were assessed, along with cost effectiveness using incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER). Random forest models were developed to predict the achievement of inactive disease (ASDAS < 1.3) and to identify key predictors.
resultsThe dose reduction group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in CRP (-4.05 vs. +2.83 mg/L, p < 0.001), BASDAI (-3.00 vs. +0.89, p < 0.001), and ASDAS (-1.42 vs. +0.09, p < 0.001) compared to the full dose group. A greater proportion of patients in the reduced dose group achieved ASDAS < 1.3 at 12 months (93.2% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), with a shorter median time to response (4.20 vs. 4.70 months, p < 0.001). The ICER for achieving ASDAS < 1.3 was favorable (-$6,209.78; 95% CI:-$9,048.35 to-$4,015.78), supporting the cost-effectiveness of dose reduction. A random forest model identified reduced dose strategy, baseline ASDAS, BASDAI, treatment duration, and CRP as key predictors of ASDAS < 1.3, achieving an AUC of 0.845 and F1-score of 0.774.
conclusionsIn this cohort, bDMARD dose reduction was associated with preserved clinical outcomes and lower costs, suggesting it may be a viable strategy for selected patients under close clinical supervision. Predictive modeling provided actionable insights to optimize personalized treatment strategies, balancing efficacy and economic sustainability. These findings support further evaluation of dose reduction strategies, especially in resource-limited settings, to inform potential integration into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.