ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Effects of external fixator-assisted acute angulation on arterial diameter: a cadaveric model.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen fractures with bone and soft tissue loss pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery. External fixator-assisted techniques, such as acute angulation and shortening, have been proposed to facilitate wound closure. However, the vascular implications of these techniques remain unclear. This cadaveric study aimed to evaluate the effect of acute angulation on arterial narrowing at the proximal tibia and distal femur, identifying angulation thresholds and comparing the vascular tolerance between these anatomical sites.
methodsEight lower extremities from four fresh-frozen cadavers were used. Osteotomies were performed at the distal femoral and proximal tibial metaphyses. An Ilizarov circular external fixator provided controlled angulation in varus, valgus, procurvatum, and recurvatum directions. A contrast agent was used for vascular visualization under fluoroscopy. Angulation was gradually increased until arterial narrowing was observed, and the critical angles were recorded.
resultsIn the proximal tibia, the mean angulation thresholds for arterial narrowing were 45.5° in varus, 26.5° in valgus, 33.8° in procurvatum, and 13.5° in recurvatum. In the distal femur, arterial narrowing occurred at 27° in varus, 32.3° in valgus, 52° in procurvatum, and 22° in recurvatum. Varus angulation was significantly better tolerated at the tibia (p = 0.0286), while procurvatum (p = 0.0294) and recurvatum (p = 0.0286) were better tolerated at the femur. No significant difference was found in valgus angulation (p = 0.559).
conclusionsThe tibia demonstrated higher tolerance for varus angulation, while the femur allowed greater procurvatum and recurvatum before vascular compromise. Recurvatum deformities in the tibia resulted in the earliest arterial narrowing, suggesting a higher risk of vascular complications. These findings provide critical insight for surgeons performing external fixator-assisted soft tissue coverage, helping optimize angulation strategies to prevent vascular complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.