ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
In their own words: older persons' experiences of participating in co-creation.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Experiences of patients and public partners in codesign of Lynch Choices™: an evaluation study using the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS-22).Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Integrated arts engagement as preventive infrastructure for active and healthy aging: a conceptual and policy framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- "It's About Connections": A Grounded Theory of Older Adults' Engagement in Remotely Delivered Home-Based Physical and Cognitive Exercise Interventions Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Dementia.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCo-creation methods ensure that interventions are tailored to the target group by incorporating their unique insights and preferences, strengthen innovation, and facilitate implementation. Although co-creation research is becoming more common, most research exploring co-creation focuses on the researchers' perspectives rather than the experiences of the target population. By exploring these experiences, researchers can better understand the preferences for, and facilitators/barriers to, engagement and participation to inform future co-creation studies. This study aimed to explore older persons' experiences and insights into participating in co-creation of an intervention to prevent falls.
methodsQualitative interviews were conducted with 13 community-dwelling older persons (aged 66-83 years) after their participation in a co-creation study developing an intervention for fall prevention. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThree themes emerged from the analysis: Diversity of co-creators enriches understanding and creativity, Interactive activities promote learning, and Supportive environments enhance collaboration. These themes describe how participating in workshops with others deepened and broadened participants' knowledge and understanding of the subject and enabled them to contribute their experiences and perspectives. Discussing and testing exercises gave participants new insights into their physical abilities and the importance of exercise and a better understanding of the concept of motor-cognitive exercises and their role in everyday life. A respectful atmosphere where everyone shared responsibility for creating a supportive environment so all participants could express their thoughts was perceived as important by the participants.
conclusionsThe results underscore the potential for co-creation to enhance participants' knowledge and understanding of the topic, as well as their own capacity. For researchers, it is important to consider how to foster an inclusive and supportive environment, thereby boosting participation, engagement and collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.