Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420199›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2025

Exploring the efficacy and safety of Yu-Ping-Feng powder with variation against allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Zhi-Xiu Lin, Tin Muk Ho, Yan-Fang Xian, Kam Leung Chan, Qing-Qing Xu, Cho Wing Lo, Justin Che Yuen Wu, Kam Lun Hon, Sin Bond Leung, Chon Pin Chia and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04976023 (The Effects of Using Yupingfeng Powder with Variation for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04976023 phase2completednot on this map

The Effects of Using Yupingfeng Powder with Variation for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis(AR):a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Lin ZhixiuRan2022 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsAllergic RhinitisArmsYupingfeng Powder granules, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Zhi-Xiu LinSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China. linzx@cuhk.edu.hk.
Tin Muk HoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Yan-Fang XianSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5032-0366
Kam Leung ChanSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Qing-Qing XuSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Cho Wing LoHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Justin Che Yuen WuHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Kam Lun HonDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Sin Bond LeungHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Chon Pin ChiaHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Chi Him SumHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Tak Yee ChowHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Pui Kuan CheongHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Jessica Yuet Ling ChingSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Hongwei ZhangSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Ka Chun LeungHong Kong Institute of Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.
Wai Ling LinSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic condition characterized by frequent sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching and rhinorrhea. Chinese medicine formula Yu-Ping-Feng Powder with Variation (YPV) is an empirical formula modified from an ancient Chinese medicine formula named Yu-Ping-Feng Powder, which is widely used for the treatment of allergic diseases such as AR and asthma. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of YPV on AR patients with the lung and spleen Qi deficiency type using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT). STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsBetween April 2022 and June 2023, a total of 58 participants were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either YPV (n = 29) or placebo (n = 29) for 8 consecutive weeks. The changes of the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) or the Paediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PADQLQ) scores at week 8 were used as the primary outcomes. The secondary outcomes included (1) the change of TNSS at weeks 4, 12 and 16; (2) the RQLQ or the PADQLQ scores at weeks 4, 12 and 16; (3) the change of frequency of AR episodes and their severity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16; (4) the changes of the gut microbiota composition in stool samples at week 8; and (5) adverse events related to the study treatment.

resultsYPV treatment could significantly improve the RQLQ score in AR patients at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (p = 0.05, p = 0.04, p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively), when compared with the placebo treatment. However, it did not improve the TNSS score at week 8 in AR patients when compared with the placebo group. In addition, YPV treatment could reduce the VAS score in AR patients at weeks 12 and 16 when compared with the placebo group, although the reductions were not statistically significant (p = 0.06 and p = 0.08, respectively). Importantly, no overt adverse effects were observed in both YPV and placebo groups.

conclusionYPV was well-tolerated and could effectively ameliorate multiple symptoms of AR and improve the quality of life of AR patients after 8-week treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04976023. Registered 26 July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04976023?cond=The%20Effects%20of%20Using%20Yupingfeng%20Powder%20with%20Variation%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Allergic%20Rhinitis&rank=2.

Indexed as

Allergic rhinitisRCTYu-Ping-Feng powder with variation (YPV)

Identifiers

PMID40420199
PMCPMC12105225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.