Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420173›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2025

Does mass chloroquine treatment have any role in the elimination of Plasmodium vivax ?

Nicholas J White, Somya Mehra, James A Watson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas J WhiteMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. nickw@tropmedres.ac.
Somya MehraMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
James A WatsonCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries in the Greater Mekong sub-region (GMS) have been encouraged to deploy mass chloroquine treatments given monthly for four months to reduce the burden of vivax malaria. This paper summarizes briefly current knowledge on Plasmodium vivax epidemiology, the biology of vivax relapse and previous experience using dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine mass treatments in the GMS to show why this approach would be extremely cost-ineffective. Around 800 full treatment courses in 200 people would be needed to prevent one symptomatic case. Mass chloroquine treatment will contribute little or nothing to the elimination of vivax malaria in this area.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsChloroquineMalaria, VivaxMass Drug AdministrationArtemisininsHumansPiperazinesPlasmodium vivaxQuinolinesAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolChloroquinepiperaquinePiperazinesQuinolinesChloroquineEliminationMass drug administrationPlasmodium vivax

Identifiers

PMID40420173
PMCPMC12105338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.