Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420148›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Cervical cancer screening uptake and its associated factor in Sub-Sharan Africa: a machine learning approach.

Fetlework Gubena Arage, Zinabu Bekele Tadese, Eliyas Addisu Taye, Tigist Kifle Tsegaw, Tsegasilassie Gebremariam Abate, Eyob Akalewold Alemu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fetlework Gubena ArageDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. fetle0123@gmail.com.
Zinabu Bekele TadeseDepartment of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Samara University, Semera, Ethiopia.
Eliyas Addisu TayeDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tigist Kifle TsegawDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tsegasilassie Gebremariam AbateDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Lemi Kura Subcity Health Office, Addis Ababa City Administration Health Bureau, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eyob Akalewold AlemuDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer, which includes squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is preventable through early screening, but incidence and mortality rates are significantly higher in LMICs, with 94% of deaths occurring in these regions. Poor implementation of screening programs, in addition to multiple health system barriers, leads to a high burden from cervical cancer in these countries. Projections show increasing cases and deaths due to the disease by 2030. Using machine learning instead of the usual statistical tests will incorporate the complex and non-linear relationship of factors in predicting the outcome variable.

methodThe secondary data for ten Sub-Saharan African countries were utilized from the Demographic and Health Survey, DHS, to evaluate cervical cancer screening uptake among women aged 25-49 years. During cleaning missing values and outliers were removed. Class balancing by Synthetic minority oversampling techniques (SMOT) was done and tuning hyperparameters via grid search was used in the models before splitting into training and validation sets containing 89% and 20%, respectively. The following machine learning classification algorithms were used in the study: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbor, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, and Extra Trees. These algorithms were employed to predict cervical cancer screening uptake. The performance of the models was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.

resultIn this study, a cervical cancer screening uptake was predicted among 75,360 weighted samples of women from an African country, aged 25-49 with the final data for model formulation of 53,461, where the Extra Trees Classifier obtained an accuracy of 94.13%, a precision of 95.76%, recall of 94.12%, F1-score of 93.80%. Then followed Random Forest: accuracy = 93.87, precision = 99.18%. Health visits, proximity to health care, using contraceptives, residing in urban settings, and exposure to media were its most crucial predictors. The ensemble methods, such as Extra Trees and Random Forest, showed the best generalization, indicating that this work well on complex datasets and can help devise targeted intervention strategies.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that the ensemble machine learning models, such as Extra Trees Classifier and Random Forest, are promising in predicting cervical cancer screening uptake among African women with accuracies of 94.13% and 93.87%, respectively. Key predictors include healthcare access, sociocultural factors, media exposure, residence in urban areas, and contraceptive use. The findings emphasize the need for a reduction in care barriers and the use of family planning visits and mass media in promoting screening. These results will be validated in different populations in order to find the clinical integration via decision support systems.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMachine LearningPatient Acceptance of Health CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedCervical cancerEnsemble methodFeature importanceMachine learningScreeningSub-Sharan

Identifiers

PMID40420148
PMCPMC12107765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.