ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Surfactant representation using COSMO screened charge density for adsorption isotherm prediction using Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN).
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Efficiency Prediction of Surfactant Properties through Automated Hydrophilic-Hydrophobic Partitioning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting surfactant adsorption using the currently available isotherm model is limited to one or two independent variables: equilibrium concentration and temperature. This study aims to develop an adsorption model that includes molecular features, testing conditions, and solid properties in the model. A Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) was structured by integrating adsorption isotherm into artificial neural networks (ANN). The model was trained using a dataset containing 56 adsorption isotherms and 20 types of anionic and nonionic surfactants under various conditions with sand and silica oxide as their solids. The surfactants were quantified using sets of descriptors generated from molecular counting, charge distribution, and Conductor-like Screening Model (COSMO) screened charge density. The COSMO-screened charge density descriptors provide the highest accuracy in representing the surfactant molecule. The interpretation of molecular structure effect and surfactant-solid interaction described using COSMO-screened charge density showed that adsorption between the surfactant and solid media involves hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interaction. The PINN model achieves high accuracy with 93% training and 85% validation with fivefold cross-validation. Later, the model was evaluated and used to generate an adsorption isotherm and predict unseen surfactant adsorption. Adsorption prediction with unseen surfactants showed high accuracy with the surfactant for familiar structure (RMSE 0.07 mg/g) and promising profile for the whole new structure (RMSE 2.95 mg/g). Scientific contribution This study advances the field by integrating COSMO-screened charge density descriptors into a physics-informed deep learning model to predict surfactant adsorption isotherms, accounting for molecular features, testing conditions, and solid properties. The incorporation of COSMO-screened charge density offers a novel approach to accurately represent surfactant molecules, enabling accurate prediction of their adsorption behavior. This approach extends conventional models, which are often limited to empirical parameters or fewer variables. This physics-informed framework significantly enhances the understanding of surfactant-solid interactions and offers a robust predictive tool for optimizing surfactant formulations, aiming to minimize adsorption losses in chemical enhanced oil recovery and environmental remediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.