ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Current status of the immunogenicity of enzyme replacement therapy in fabry disease.
Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evaluating the relationship between antidrug antibodies and efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with Fabry disease receiving enzyme replacement therapy: a systematic literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: A state-of-the-art review.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesPooled it
- Longitudinal Adipokine and Lipid Profiles in Fabry Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Immunogenicity in Fabry Disease: Current Issues, Coping Strategies, and Future Directions.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Fabry Disease: A Focus on the Role of Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In patients with Fabry disease (FD), treatment with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), may trigger the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). The consequences of this immune reaction range from the transient appearance of clinically insignificant ADAs to the generation of neutralizing antibodies that negate the clinical benefit of the biotherapeutic agent, lead to side effects (such as injection site reactions), and even cause severe, life-threatening symptoms. Many factors may influence the immunogenicity of these therapeutic proteins. Currently, there are three commercially available long-term ERT treatments in patients with FD: agalsidase alfa, agalsidase beta, and more recently, pegunigalsidase alfa. Neutralizing ADAs are present in approximately 40% of male FD patients treated with ERT based on agalsidase alfa or agalsidase beta and have shown in vitro cross-reactivity with both agalsidases. Their formation seems to be irreversible, meaning that most patients with positive neutralizing ADAs remain so for up to 10 years after starting treatment. Recent studies show that in some patients, pre-existing ADAs against agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta have lower affinity and lower inhibitory effects against pegunigalsidase alfa. Additionally, in clinical trials involving naïve patients, neutralizing antibodies were mostly transient, although further studies are needed to confirm these findings in clinical practice. The formation of ADAs is often associated with a worse clinical prognosis and a faster progression of the disease. Given the rapid progression of FD, measuring ADAs titers is essential to provide personalised treatment for each patient. This is why international recommendations highlight the importance of monitoring the existence of ADAs, their neutralising activity, and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) levels in patients receiving ERT. However, several unresolved issues remain, such as the importance of ADAs levels (particularly neutralising ADAs), the standardisation of assay methods, the interpretation of results, and the implications of these findings for therapeutic strategies. Overcoming the development of ADAs is critical to improving treatment outcomes in patients with FD, different strategies have been explored to address this challenge. The present work aims to review latest developments related to all aspects mentioned above, while also analyzing the potential role of therapeutic innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.