Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420141›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychiatry2025

Dynamic risk and protective factors in mentally disordered offenders: forensic psychiatry treatment monitoring, prison release and length of stay.

Kerstin Weber, Lena Magnenat, Sandrine Morier, Christophe Menu, Philippe Bertschy, François R Herrmann, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kerstin WeberDivision of Institutional Measures, Medical Direction, Geneva University Hospitals, Avenue Rosemont 12, Geneva, 1208, Switzerland. kerstin.weber@hug.ch.
Lena MagnenatDivision of Institutional Measures, Medical Direction, Geneva University Hospitals, Avenue Rosemont 12, Geneva, 1208, Switzerland.
Sandrine MorierDivision of Institutional Measures, Medical Direction, Geneva University Hospitals, Avenue Rosemont 12, Geneva, 1208, Switzerland.
Christophe MenuSecured penitentiary Curabilis, Department of Institutions and Information Technology, State of Geneva, Chemin de Champ-Dollon 20, Puplinge, 1244, Switzerland.
Philippe BertschyDepartment of Institutions and Information Technology, State of Geneva, Rue de l'Hôtel-de-Ville 14, Geneva, 1211, Switzerland.
François R HerrmannDepartment of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Route de Mon-Idée, Thônex, 1226, Switzerland.
Panteleimon GiannakopoulosDivision of Institutional Measures, Medical Direction, Geneva University Hospitals, Avenue Rosemont 12, Geneva, 1208, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe reduction of violence risk and crime recidivism is the core marker of progress in forensic psychiatry treatment for mentally disordered offenders, and commonly used to decide upon discharge from prison-based security clinics. While dynamic risk is expected to relate to treatment progress, static risk is expected to predict discharge from prison-based treatments. Integrated risk-protection assessment is thought to facilitate prediction of treatment outcome.

methodsIn a two-year prospective observational cohort study using a repeated measures design, we monitored treatment as usual induced changes in violence and protective factors, in 117 offenders of a medium-security forensic clinic in Switzerland. Mixed-effects and multinomial logistic regression models were used to predict longitudinal risk and protection evolution, length of stay, and discharge locations.

resultsForensic psychiatry treatment was indeed associated with decrease in dynamic risk and enhanced protection, contrary to static risk. After 18-24 months of treatment, protective factors counterbalanced risk factors. For risk, both a numeric scale and a structured professional judgement approach equally showed significant improvement over time. For protection and integrated risk-protection, structured professional judgement ratings failed to show significant treatment-related change. Discharge to low-security psychiatry wards was predicted only by favorable baseline risk, protection, and integrated risk-protection, but not by their treatment-related evolution. Longer length of stay was predicted by higher baseline total risk only.

conclusionsStudy results confirm the need to distinguish dynamic from static risk in forensic psychiatric treatment monitoring, and to include integrated risk-protection measures. Treatment length and discharge are predicted by the offenders' baseline risk profile, but not by the evolution of risk and protection factors. A structured professional judgment approach in risk and protection assessment leads to different longitudinal results than the use of numeric scale scores.

Indexed as

CriminalsForensic PsychiatryLength of StayMental DisordersPrisonersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProtective FactorsRecidivismRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSwitzerlandCourt-ordered treatmentLength of stayMentally disordered offendersPrison releaseProtective factorsViolence risk

Identifiers

PMID40420141
PMCPMC12105388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.